Jason A. Johns

Jason A. Johns has no picture

Jason Johns is an associate in the Energy & Telecommunications group. Hefocuses his practice on federal energy regulation, reliability issues,transmission, and power purchase agreements. Jason is also registered topractice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and has assisted inauthoring patents for various chemical processes.


Articles By This Author

RFP for Renewable Resources.

NV Energy issued its Spring 2010 Request for Proposals seeking new renewable resources.  NV Energy hopes to use the RFP to meet its RPS requirement of serving 12% of retail load with renewable energy in 2010.  Bidders should also be aware that NV Energy's non-refundable bid deposits have changed:  projects 10 MW of larger must submit a $10,000 deposit ($7,500 if the same facility was bid into the 2009 RFP); projects under 10 MW must submit a $5,000 deposit ($3,500 if the same project was bid into the 2009 RFP).  Responses to the RFP are due April 16.

 

Details regarding NV Energy's Spring 2010 RFP can be found by clicking here.

Southern California Public Power Authority RFP

Here's a new opportunity for renewable energy developers.  The Southern California Public Power Authority has issued a request for proposals seeking renewable energy generation "with supporting infrastructure(s) as structured projects through (i) facility ownership; or (ii) power purchase agreement with ownership option(s), in one or more facilities."  SCPPA is a California joint powers authority that plans to purchase an undivided equity share in facilities, issue tax-exempt debt financing, and sell output at cost to its municipal utility members.  SCPPA will also consider straight or pre-pay power purchase agreements that include a facility purchase option.

Responses are due May 28, 2010.  Follow the link for the solicitation materials: www.scppa.org/Downloads/RFP/Renewable_Energy_Projects_052810.pdf

FERC Determines That Battery Storage Devices Qualify as Transmission Facilities. Is the Door Open for Other Energy Storage Devices?

In late January, FERC issued an order in response to a filing by Western Grid Development LLC that asked FERC to declare that Western Grid's proposed battery storage devices are transmission facilities eligible for certain rate incentives.  Western Grid described its battery technology as 10 to 50 MW sodium sulfur batteries that would be installed at strategic places on the California ISO transmission grid in order to provide voltage support and protect against transmission overloads.  In a description that seemed significant to FERC, Western Grid stated that its batteries would only enhance transmission reliability at the California ISO's direction, and that the batteries would not operate or participate in energy markets or provide electricity for commercial sale. 

FERC examines energy storage devices on a case-by-case basis because storage devices don't fit squarely within the traditional transmission, distribution, or generation categories of assets.  In this case, FERC gravitated to the notion that the battery devices would not provide capacity or energy to be sold in the energy market, and that Western Grid would not retain any revenues outside of the transmission access charge (unlike generators).  For these and other reasons, FERC distinguished Western Grid from similar filings (see Nevada Hydro II--pumped storage), and determined that Western Grid's technology will act enough like transmission assets to warrant eligibility for transmission rate incentives.  FERC's approval of rate incentives, however, was conditional upon the California ISO approving Western Grid's projects in the transmission planning process. 

Although FERC repeated numerous times that its decision was based on the "specific circumstances and characteristics" of Western Grid's projects, the order shows potential for energy storage devices.  If such devices can show that they act sufficiently like traditional transmission assets (like capacitors), they may be able to obtain very valuable transmission rate incentives.  Whether this opens the door for compressed air energy storage and pumped hydro (but see Nevada Hydro II) is still up in the air, but rest assured that these questions will be at FERC before too long.

U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Third-Parties Challenging Energy Contract Rates Must Clear the Mobile-Sierra Hurdle

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important ruling clarifying how the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) must apply the Mobile-Sierra doctrine.  The Mobile-Sierra doctrine informs how FERC should evaluate whether a contract rate for energy is just and reasonable, and the doctrine provides that FERC's sole concern should be whether the contract rates being challenged adversely affect the public interest--a high hurdle.  Until today, some people questioned whether the Mobile-Sierra doctrine was limited to parties to a contract, and whether non-contracting parties bringing a challenge would be held to a lower standard.  The Court, however, made clear that the Mobile-Sierra doctrine should apply to any party (including FERC) challenging whether energy rates are just and reasonable, stating that a presumption that applies to contracting parties only, but not anybody else, fails to establish the contractual stability that Mobile-Sierra aimed to secure.

To read more about today's U.S. Supreme Court decision, click here.

RFPs Galore.

The following RFPs for renewable energy and RECs came to my attention today.

1.  Dayton Power and Light Company is seeking to acquire up to 313,000,000 kWh of eligible RECs by 2013 in order to meet Ohio's RPS requirements.  Deadline for submissions is August 7, 2009.  Click here for more information.

2.  The Western Area Power Administration is seeking RECs on behalf of certain WAPA regional offices and federal agencies.  Deadline for submissions is August 7, 2009.  Click here for more information. 

3.  Southern California Edison seeks to acquire energy from eligible renewable resources.  Click here for more information.

4.  AEP Ohio is looking to acquire 30,000,000 kWh of eligible RECs to use toward compliance with Ohio's RPS requirements.  Interested parties must submit a Notice of Intent to Bid by July 31, 2009.  Click here for more information.  AEP Ohio also has an active RFP for renewable energy, which you can learn about here.

5.  Puget Sound Energy seeks to acquire 30,000,000 kWh of eligible RECs.  Interested parties must submit a Notice of Intent to Bid by July 31, 2009.

6.  Bryan Texas Utilities hopes to acquire up to 10 MW of utility-scale solar energy and the associated RECs generated within ERCOT.  The deadline for submissions is August 24, 2009.

7.  Seattle City Light is looking to acquire 50 MW of new renewable resources to meet Washington RPS requirements.  Submission deadline is August 28, 2009.  You can find more information here.

8.  The US General Services Administration seeks to acquire 40,000,000 kWh per year of RECs for the Architect of the Capitol and other federal agencies.  Submission deadline is September 1, 2009.  You can find more information here.

 

FERC Aims to Accelerate Smart Grid Deployment

On July 16, 2009, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a Policy Statement on smart grid technologies, providing guidance on future smart grid interoperability standards and establishing an interim incentive rate policy that applies to near-term smart grid deployments (even those used in pilot or demonstration projects).  Notably, FERC identified four technologies as being key to smart grid development:  (1) digital devices and software that provide system operators with the near real-time ability to react to bulk power system conditions; (2) demand response; (3) electric storage devices, such as batteries and pumped storage, that will help integrate new resources into the grid; and (4) electric vehicles.  FERC intends that these technologies will inform both the smart grid standards development process as well as the Department of Energy's release of stimulus funds available under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.   

In addition, FERC established an interim rate policy that, once certain showings are made, will provide public utilities with the ability to recover the costs of FERC-jurisdictional smart grid technologies and the legacy systems being replaced.  The interim rate policy also allows public utilities to apply accelerated depreciation to smart grid deployments and recover the full cost of smart grid technologies that are later abandoned or made obsolete.  Public utilities seeking incentive rate treatment must file an appropriate application with FERC before it adopts smart grid interoperability standards.

For more information on FERC's Policy Statement, click here for our recently-released client alert.

If you would like to read the Policy Statement itself, click here.

San Diego Gas & Electric Issues RFO for Renewable Resources

Today, San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) issued a Request for Offers seeking eligible renewable resources that the utility will use to meet its California Renewable Portfolio Standard requirements.  Respondents may submit one or more of three alternative proposals:

  • Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).  Respondents are asked to propose a 10, 15, or 20-year PPA for capacity and/or energy, but SDG&E will nevertheless consider proposals with shorter or longer durations.  Eligible Resources must be delivered to a point within California and must be begin deliveries sometime between 2010 and 2013.
  • PPA with Buyout.  Respondents offering PPAs may also submit an option price that SDG&E may exercise to purchase the resource as well as associated environmental attributes, land rights, permits, and other licenses upon conclusion of the PPA term.  This alternative is limited to resources located in San Diego County, parts of Orange County within SDG&E's service territory, or Imperial Valley areas.  Like respondents offering under the PPA alternative, respondents interested in offering resources under the PPA with Buyout alternative must begin delivering energy and/or capacity between 2010 and 2013.
  • Turnkey Facilities.  Respondents to the RFO may also propose to develop and construct a new renewable energy generation facility that SDG&E will acquire.  SDG&E is proposing the same locational requirements that apply to PPA with Buyout projects.

A limitation that applies to all respondents is that resources located in SDG&E's service territory must be no smaller than 1.5 MW, and resources outside of SDG&E's service territory must be no smaller than 5 MW.

This RFO may be a great opportunity to transact with SDG&E as it endeavors to comply with California's ever-increasing RPS standards.  SDG&E will hold two pre-bid conferences:  one in San Diego on August 5, 2009, and the other in El Centro on August 12, 2009. Those interested in attending a pre-bid conference should register by July 31. 

For more information, click here:  SDG&E 2009 RFO Info

Green Power Express Receives Green Light from FERC

On April 10, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved a request for various transmission infrastructure investment incentives submitted by Green Power Express LP (GPE), a transmission-only partnership that proposes to build a 765 kV "green superhighway" consisting of three interconnected loops in North and South Dakota, Minnesota, and Iowa.  GPE's proposal will also extend radially into Wisconsin, Illinois, and Indiana, making use of existing substations in some locations and constructing high voltage substations in others.  In total, the project will include approximately 3,000 miles of transmission lines that reach 12,000 MW of wind and stored energy.  GPE estimates the project's cost at $10-12 billion and hopes the project will be in service in 2020.

FERC's approved the following (non-exhaustive) key incentives that reduce GPE's exposure to risk in moving the project forward.

Abandoned Plant.  FERC granted GPE's request to recover prudently incurred expenses if the project is abandoned for reasons outside of GPE's control.  FERC stated that the recovery of abadonment costs is a means for encouraging transmission development, reducing the risk that GPE's investors may lose their entire investment. 

Regulatory Asset.  FERC will allow GPE to create initial and subsequent vintage regulatory assets in order to defer pre-construction, development, and start-up costs until GPE has customers from which it may later recover those costs.  Such cost deferral will also help GPE attract financiers.

Construction Work in Progress.  FERC approved GPE's request to include 100 percent of construction work in progress in its revenue requirement, allowing GPE to service its debt and reduce borrowing over the project's development--something that would otherwise be difficult for a $10-12 billion project with a 2020 in-service date.

The incentives granted to GPE, as well as other recent changes to FERC's transmission policies, show that the agency is becoming increasingly serious about spurring transmission development forward.  If we are to reach the 62 GW of wind currently in the Midwest ISO interconnection queue, as well as other renewable resources elsewhere, transmission developers will need creative regulatory solutions to help attract financiers and gain firm commitments from generation developers.  FERC continues to take positive steps forward.

A Superconductor Pipeline for Renewable Energy

Among all the interesting presentations at this month's AWEA transmission and wind workshop, American Superconductor's presentation about developments with superconducting transmission lines was particularly noteworthy.  Superconducting direct current lines offer greater efficiency, as well as siting and aesthetics benefits, but have historically fallen victim to much higher costs when compared to traditional overhead transmission lines.  However, with talks of extra-high voltage "green superhighways" transmitting renewable energy from the nation's interior to load zones, it appears from American Superconductor that the costs of a 5 GW, 200 kV superconductor line are nearly equivalent to 765 kV overhead lines when built on a 1,000 mile scale.  Perhaps we will see a superconducting pipeline instead of an extra-high voltage overlay.

For more information about the viability of superconducting transmission lines, look for American Superconductor's White Paper in the near future.  

 

 

Older Entries