<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Stephen C. Hall - Renewable + Law</title>
<link>http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/steve-hall.html</link>
<description>Stephen Hall is a partner in the Portland office of Stoel Rives LLP, and is the chair of the Firm&apos;s Renewable Energy Initiative.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:37:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:41:45 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>RNP and AWEA respond to WSJ editorial about wind energy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2">Tuesday's&nbsp;Wall Street Journal included an&nbsp;</font><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748703792704575366700528078676.html"><span><span style="font-size: 10pt"><font color="#800080">editorial</font></span></span><span style="font-size: 10pt">&nbsp;by Robert Bryce titled &quot;Wind Power Won't Cool Down the Planet,&quot; claiming that wind power does not reduce carbon pollution,&nbsp;based on&nbsp;fossil fuel industry studies.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 10pt">In response to Bryce's editorial, </span><span style="font-size: 10pt">Renewable Northwest Project has released a statement from Ken Dragoon,&nbsp;RNP research director,&nbsp;countering Bryce's claims with facts from independent sources.&nbsp;(</span><a href="http://www.rnp.org/index.php?q=node/1001"><span><span style="font-size: 10pt"><font color="#800080">http://www.rnp.org/index.php?q=node/1001</font></span></span><span style="font-size: 10pt">) </span></a></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt">American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) has also issued a similar statement.&nbsp; <a href="http://awea.org/newsroom/pdf/08-27-10-Wind_and_emissions_response.pdf">http://awea.org/newsroom/pdf/08-27-10-Wind_and_emissions_response.pdf</a><span style="font-size: 10pt">.</span></span></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2010/08/articles/wind-energy/rnp-and-awea-respond-to-wsj-editorial-about-wind-energy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2010/08/articles/wind-energy/rnp-and-awea-respond-to-wsj-editorial-about-wind-energy/</guid>
<category>Climate Change</category><category>Renewable</category><category>Solar</category><category>Wind</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:37:01 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephen C. Hall</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Wind and Solar Power Industries Now Employ Twice the Number of Workers in the U.S. as the Coal Mining Industry</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333">In the midst of an unprecedented amount of&nbsp;bad news surrounding the economy, the <a href="http://www.awea.org/newsroom/releases/solar_and_wind_09Jan09.html">robust growth in employment in the wind and solar energy sectors</a> has been receiving a lot of attention.&nbsp;Wind industry jobs have increased 70% over the past year, totaling 85,000 in 2008.&nbsp;These <a href="http://www.awea.org/frontpage/jobs_highlighted_on_Capitol_Hill_28Jan09.html ">85,000 jobs in the wind industry </a>include some 13,000 manufacturing jobs, many of which are being filled by workers who lost jobs in other manufacturing industries, like the steel industry.&nbsp;Similarly, the solar industry employs more than 80,000 workers in the U.S.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333">CNNMoney.com ran an article earlier this week noting that the <a href="http://greenwombat.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/28/wind-jobs-outstrip-the-coal-industry/">wind industry now outstrips the coal mining industry in number of workers</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;The article, &ldquo;Wind Jobs Outstrips Coal,&rdquo; noted that the coal mining and extraction industry employs about 81,000 workers.&nbsp;According to a 2007 U.S. Department of Energy report cited in the article, these numbers have been steady in recent years, but are down nearly 50% since 1986.&nbsp;Estimates for the total direct employment in the U.S. coal industry range from 136,000 to 174,000 workers, and includes those who mine coal, haul it by rail, barge and truck, and who operate and maintain coal-fired power plants. Thus, the solar and wind energy sectors have quickly caught up the coal industry in terms of overall employment and will soon surpass the coal industry in total employment.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333">These facts demonstrate the potential of renewable energy to lead the country&rsquo;s economic recovery when you consider that renewable energy currently supplies a tiny portion of the nation&rsquo;s electricity supply&mdash;about 3 percent&mdash;compared to coal, which supplies about 50 percent of our electricity.<br />
</span></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2009/01/articles/solar/the-wind-and-solar-power-industries-now-employ-twice-the-number-of-workers-in-the-us-as-the-coal-mining-industry/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2009/01/articles/solar/the-wind-and-solar-power-industries-now-employ-twice-the-number-of-workers-in-the-us-as-the-coal-mining-industry/</guid>
<category>Renewable</category><category>Solar</category><category>Wind</category><category>clean energy jobs</category><category>green jobs</category><category>renewable energy jobs</category><category>solar energy jobs</category><category>wind energy jobs</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:56:14 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephen C. Hall</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>California PUC Moves to Allow Unbundled RECs</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">The California Public Utility Commission issued a draft decision on October 29th authorizing the use of unbundled and tradable renewable energy certificates (&ldquo;RECs&rdquo; or &ldquo;TRECs&rdquo;) for compliance with California&rsquo;s RPS.&nbsp;</p>]]><![CDATA[<p>The draft decision also outlines the structure and rules for a tradable REC market and for integrating these RECs into the RPS &ldquo;flexible compliance system.&rdquo;&nbsp;Comments are due on Nov. 18, 2008.&nbsp;The draft decision can be found here: <a href="http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/efile/PD/92913.htm"><font color="#800080">http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/efile/PD/92913.htm</font></a>.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2008/10/articles/renewable/california-puc-moves-to-allow-unbundled-recs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2008/10/articles/renewable/california-puc-moves-to-allow-unbundled-recs/</guid>
<category>Hydropower</category><category>Ocean/Wave Energy</category><category>RECs</category><category>RPS</category><category>RPS compliance</category><category>Renewable</category><category>Solar</category><category>TRECs</category><category>Wind</category><category>green tags</category><category>renewable energy certificates</category><category>renewable energy credits</category><category>renewable portfolio standards</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:38:45 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephen C. Hall</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Portland General Electric&apos;s RFP Garners offers of 3,000 MW</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Portland Business Journal is reporting that Portland General Electric Company received 38 offers in its April 2008 RFP totaling&nbsp;up to 3000 MW in renewable energy.&nbsp;</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://portland.bizjournals.com/portland/stories/2008/09/01/story5.html">http://portland.bizjournals.com/portland/stories/2008/09/01/story5.html</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;PGE's RFP called for 218 MWs of energy to begin generating electricity between 2009 and 2014.&nbsp; Based on this response from bidders, PGE&nbsp;stated that it expects to meet its 2015 deadline of 15 percent renewable energy early.&nbsp; Oregon's renewable portfolio standard (RPS) requires utilities subject to the RPS to achieve 25 percent renewables by 2025.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2008/09//portland-general-electrics-rfp-garners-offers-of-3000-mw/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2008/09//portland-general-electrics-rfp-garners-offers-of-3000-mw/</guid>
<category>Geothermal</category><category>Ocean/Wave Energy</category><category>Renewable</category><category>Solar</category><category>Wind</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:06:37 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephen C. Hall</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Oregon Public Utility Commission Gives Green Light to Third-party Ownership Model for Distributed Generation</title>
<description><![CDATA[Now for some good news.&nbsp;Today the Oregon Public Utility Commission (OPUC) issued an important decision giving a green light to companies seeking to own and operate solar and wind-powered distributed generation facilities.&nbsp;Third-party ownership of renewable distributed generation&mdash;especially solar&mdash;has really taken off in the past few years because it allows a utility customer to enjoy the benefits of on-site renewable energy, but pay the facility owner only for the electricity generated by the facility.&nbsp;]]><![CDATA[<p>The company that owns and operates the facility on the customer&rsquo;s premises receives a payment for the electricity generated by the project and is also eligible for certain tax credits and other incentives.&nbsp;(Sometimes this arrangement is called the &ldquo;power purchase agreement&rdquo; or &ldquo;PPA&rdquo; model)&nbsp;</p>
<p>The key issues before the OPUC were (i) whether a utility customer was eligible for net-metering under this arrangement and (ii) whether the third-party owner of the solar facility was subject to regulation by the Commission, either as an Energy Service Supplier (ESS) or as a &ldquo;public utility&rdquo; under state law.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In its Order, the Commission concluded that utility customers were still eligible for net metering service even if the net-metered facility was owned by (or leased from) a third party.</p>
<p>On the question of whether the third&ndash;party owner of a net-metering facility was required to register as an ESS under Oregon&rsquo;s direct access law, the Commission ruled that a third-party owner was not an ESS.&nbsp;The Commission reasoned that the facility owner was not using the utility&rsquo;s distribution system and was thus not providing electricity services under &ldquo;direct access.&rdquo;&nbsp;This ruling was important to renewable energy providers because at least one existing utility direct access tariff requires an ESS to supply 100 percent of a customer&rsquo;s load.&nbsp;</p>
<p>As to the question of whether the third-party owner was a &ldquo;public utility&rdquo; under state law, the Commission clarified that a third-party owner of a wind or solar-powered net metering facility is not a &ldquo;public utility.&rdquo;&nbsp;However, the Commission noted that &ldquo;[w]ithout a change in the existing legislation&rdquo; (hint, hint) a net-metered facility that generates electricity from a source other than solar or wind would likely be deemed a &ldquo;public utility.&rdquo;&nbsp;Finally, the Commission ruled that the owner of the net-metering facility is entitled to the renewable energy credits (RECs) associated with the output of the facility.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></p>
<p>You can link to the decision here:</p>
<p><a href="http://apps.puc.state.or.us/edockets/orders.asp?ordernumber=08-388">http://apps.puc.state.or.us/edockets/orders.asp?ordernumber=08-388</a> </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2008/07/articles/solar/oregon-public-utility-commission-gives-green-light-to-thirdparty-ownership-model-for-distributed-generation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2008/07/articles/solar/oregon-public-utility-commission-gives-green-light-to-thirdparty-ownership-model-for-distributed-generation/</guid>
<category>Renewable</category><category>Solar</category><category>Sustainable Development</category><category>Wind</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:55:06 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephen C. Hall</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Welcome to the Renewable + LawSM Blog</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Greetings!&nbsp;On behalf of the Stoel Rives Renewable Energy Initiative, I would like to welcome you to our blog, Renewable + Law.<sup>SM</sup>&nbsp;We intend Renewable + Law<sup>SM</sup> to be a catalyst for lively discussion about renewable energy and climate policies, major renewable energy projects, emerging technologies, market developments, new laws, tax credits and industry scuttlebutt.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;<img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.stoel.com/images/graphics/leaves1.jpg" /></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">For reasons ranging from concern about global warming and the environment to economic growth, jobs, and national security, renewable energy has evolved into a major industry.&nbsp;Globally, renewable energy was a $148 billion business in 2007.&nbsp;In addition to renewable energy, emerging climate policy is shaping up to be one of the most important economic forces in our time.&nbsp;As of this writing, all three U.S. presidential candidates are in favor of some form of carbon cap and trade program at the federal level.&nbsp;At the state level, California has already adopted economywide caps on greenhouse gas emissions and other western states are pursuing a similar program through the Western Climate Initiative.&nbsp;Together, the western states are leading the nation in the development of cap and trade policies.&nbsp;Climate policy, in turn, will spur greater demand for renewable energy, energy efficiency, green building, carbon offset projects and other cleantech applications.&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">From Seattle to San Diego, from Portland to Minneapolis, and from Boise to Salt Lake City to Sacramento, Stoel Rives has offices with lawyers working on renewable energy projects.&nbsp;Providing valuable advice to clients requires us to keep abreast of renewable energy and climate policy developments to place those novel legal questions into a larger context.&nbsp;Renewable + Law<sup>SM</sup> lets us share with you our passion for solar energy, wind energy, biofuels, ocean and hydrokinetic energy, biomass, waste-to-energy, geothermal and other clean technologies.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Thank you for your interest.&nbsp;We hope that you enjoy Renewable + Law!<sup>SM</sup></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">STEPHEN HALL</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Learn more about Stoel Rives and our <a href="http://www.stoel.com/showarea.aspx?Show=2720">national legal practice devoted to renewable energy</a>.&nbsp;You may also have an interest in our complimentary books on various <a href="http://www.stoel.com/showresource.aspx?Show=2740">legal issues involved with developing various renewable energy projects</a>.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2008/06/articles/renewable/welcome-to-the-renewable-lawsm-blog/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/2008/06/articles/renewable/welcome-to-the-renewable-lawsm-blog/</guid>
<category>Climate Change</category><category>Renewable</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:00:41 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephen C. Hall</dc:creator>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>
