Ninth Circuit Decision Further Dismantles an Already Weakened Federal Transmission Siting Authority

Congress’ experiment with establishing federal siting authority for transmission lines suffered another setback after a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision issued yesterday, February 1, 2011, vacated the Department of Energy’s (“DOE”) 2007 Transmission Congestion Study that had designated national interest electric transmission corridors in mid-Atlantic and Southwestern states. This ruling is the latest of three court and agency decisions that have limited or undermined the federal siting authority established at Federal Power Act section 216 by the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

Congress created section 216 to confront concerns that states were acting too slowly in siting new transmission lines needed to address growing reliability and congestion problems. In part, section 216 directs the DOE to study transmission congestion in consultation with the states, and designate certain transmission-constrained areas as national interest electric transmission corridors (“NIETCs”). Section 216 also grants the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission authority to issue permits to construct transmission facilities in these NIETCs under certain circumstances. Congress also provided that an applicant who receives a permit to construct transmission in a NIETC would be granted with the authority to acquire rights-of-way by eminent domain. In sum, section 216 had the potential to uncork the transmission bottleneck, but that potential has not materialized.

To continue reading, click here.

Come Learn What Every Renewable Energy Developer and Storage Provider Needs to Know About Integrating Variable Energy Resources

Wind & Solar Integration Summit, Scottsdale, AZ

January 24, 2011, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m., Workshop

January 25, 2011, 7 a.m. – 5:15 p.m., Conference

January 26, 2011, 9 a.m. – 11:45 a.m., Conference

 

As the Workshop Chair, I would like to extend you an invitation to the Wind & Solar Integration Summit, presented by Infocast. Join me and my colleagues in sunny Scottsdale, Arizona as we gather with industry experts—federal and state regulators, representatives from ISOs, independent power producers, and pioneers in energy storage—to discuss the challenges posed by renewable energy integration and the opportunities for businesses that make the necessary adjustments to prepare for the 21st century grid. We will be kicking off the conference with a keynote address by FERC Chairman, Jon Wellinghoff.

 

This 3-day event will include a pre-conference workshop on the fundamentals of integrating variable energy resources and electric energy storage (EES), and will feature a presentation by Stoel Rives partner and Conference Chair, Stephen Hall. The conference will address issues and recent developments in integration, including market solutions and investments to facilitate renewable energy integration, changes to the regulatory landscape, and the role of EES in enabling increased renewables integration. Stoel Rives partners Ed Einowski, Bill Holmes, and Jennifer Martin will present on managing the risks associated with curtailment and integration issues in PPAs. 

 

In case you need another good excuse to get to Arizona in January, Stoel Rives is currently offering a discount on registration. For more event details and registration information, please see: http://www.stoel.com/showevent.aspx?Show=7277

Renewable Energy Law Alert: The Upper Midwest Reopens to Renewable Energy Development

Yesterday, December 16, 2010, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) conditionally approved a proposal by the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator (MISO) that significantly changes how large transmission upgrades are funded across the MISO region.

MISO’s proposal creates a new category of transmission projects called Multi-Value Projects (MVPs) for upgrades that are determined to enable reliable and economic delivery of energy in support of public policy mandates or laws that address transmission reliability and congestion across multiple transmission zones.

MISO’s proposal is effective as of July 16, 2010 and thus applies to transmission projects identified in Appendix A of 2010 MISO Transmission Expansion Plan (MTEP).

To continue reading, click here.

If you have any questions about the order, how it may affect your generation or transmission project, or wind energy development in the Midwest, please contact one of the following attorneys:

Minneapolis, MN
Mark Hanson at (612) 373-8823 or mjhanson@stoel.com
Kevin Johnson at (612) 373-8803 or kdjohnson@stoel.com
Kevin Prohaska at (612) 373-8805 or krprohaska@stoel.com
David Quinby at (612) 373-8825 or dtquinby@stoel.com
Joe Thompson at (612) 373-8822 or jrthompson@stoel.com
Sarah Johnson Phillips at (612) 373-8843 or sjphillips@stoel.com

Portland, OR
Jennifer Martin at (503) 294-9852 or jhmartin@stoel.com
Marcus Wood at (503) 294-9434 or mwood@stoel.com
Sara Bergan at (503) 294-9336 or sebergan@stoel.com
Jason Johns at (503) 294-9618 or jajohns@stoel.com

FERC Decision Opens Door for New Wind Development in the Upper Midwest

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) opened the door today for new investment in transmission lines in the Upper Midwest that will deliver new wind energy to market.  By establishing a methodology for sharing the cost of new transmission lines, FERC’s decision could provide a significant boost to wind development in the region.  For more information, see our full alert.

Stoel Rives Energy Regulation Report

IN THIS EDITION:

  1. FERC opens a rulemaking on variable energy resources.
  2. FERC extends the comment deadline in the appeals by wind farms registered for transmission reliability functions.
  3. FERC denies a petition to protect priority to interconnection capacity rights.

FERC Opens Rulemaking on Intra-Hour Scheduling, Forecasting Requirements, and Integration Services for Variable Energy Resources

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) proposed amending its pro forma open access transmission tariff to correct practices that are unduly discriminate against variable energy resources (VERs) such as wind and solar energy generators. In the November 18, 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FERC outlines measures that, if adopted, will (a) require transmission providers to offer transmission service that can be scheduled on 15-minute intervals, (b) require interconnection customers that operate VERs to provide site-specific forecasting and meteorological data to transmission providers that are deploying and/or developing power production forecasting processes, and (c) add a new rate schedule for generation regulation (i.e., integration) services. The proposed rulemaking is the first to come out of the January 2010 Notice of Inquiry on the Integration of VERs—a docket that received well over 100 comments from industry stakeholders.

Read more on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on VERs here.

FERC Extends Comment Period in Wind Farms’ Appeal of NERC Decision to Uphold Registration as Transmission Owners/Operators

FERC has extended the comment deadline in an appeal by two wind farms that were registered for Transmission Owner and Transmission Operator reliability functions, a potentially costly registration for the wind farms that was affirmed by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) in October. The NERC decision and its supporting analysis, if affirmed by FERC, have the potential to broadly apply to many generation developers, owners, and operators.

Read more on the wind farms’ appeal here.

FERC Denies Puget Sound Energy's Request to Protect Interconnection Capacity Rights

In June of this year, Puget Sound Energy (Puget) filed a petition with FERC for a declaratory order to protect its rights to 1,250 MW of interconnection capacity that would eventually serve the Lower Snake River Project wind farm. Puget argued that constructing the entire interconnection capacity needed for the full project upfront was financially efficient and environmentally responsible, and that other developers should not be able to claim rights to the capacity. On November 18, 2010, FERC distinguished the petition from an earlier decision in Milford and denied Puget’s request to establish its priority rights to the interconnection capacity. FERC reasoned that the capacity over Puget’s generator lead lines must be governed by its open access transmission tariff. FERC also found that any interconnection capacity that is not appropriately reserved for Puget’s native load must be made available to other open access customers.

Read more on the FERC decision denying Puget’s request to protect its interconnection capacity rights here.

If you have questions about the issues addressed in this report, please contact:

Marcus Wood at (503) 294-9434 or mwood@stoel.com
Jennifer Martin at (503) 294-9852 or jhmartin@stoel.com
Jason Johns at (503) 294-9618 or jajohns@stoel.com
Sara Bergan at (503) 294-9336 or sebergan@stoel.com

Idaho PUC Issues Proposal to Revise Prices Paid to QF Wind Generators Under PURPA

The Idaho Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has issued a straw man proposal that lays out plans to revise the surrogate avoided resource (SAR) methodology used to calculate avoided cost rates for wind generators.  The "avoided cost" is the price paid to Qualifying Facilities that are selling power to Idaho utilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA).   

The PUC included six cost categories in the wind SAR:  capital costs; fixed and variable O&M costs, transmission costs; tax credits; wind integration; and forecasting costs.  The PUC assumed transmission costs of $1.90/kw-month, production tax credits at $0.021/kWh, a $0.00 REC premium, and wind integration at $6.50/MWh.  With those inputs and others, the PUC arrived at 20-year levelized wind rates for a 2010 project as follows:

Wind and Gas SARs
Utility Wind SAR Gas SAR
Avista $86.31/MWh $79.17/MWh
Idaho Power $84.72/MWh $79.19/MWh
PacifiCorp $85.06/MWh $79.31/MWh

The PUC proposed that where the Wind SAR is higher than the Gas SAR, a wind developer may choose whether to sell power at the wind or gas rate.  If the wind developer opts for the latter, it retains ownership of RECs.  If the wind developer opts for the former, RECs go to the utility.  However, when the Gas SAR is higher than the wind SAR, wind developers would only be eligible for the wind SAR, meaning that the utility would automatically receive RECs under a PPA.  Non-wind projects would be entitled to the gas SAR when the gas rate is higher, and RECs would remain with developers.

The PUC is accepting written comments on the straw man proposal until November 23, 2010.

Stoel Rives Publishes White Papers on Transmission Development

I am proud to announce the publication of two white papers that focus on the issues of transmission development and broader issues facing renewable energy.  These white papers were written by attorneys at Stoel Rives and were prepared at the request of the Energy Foundation, a partnership of major foundations interested in sustainable energy.  The Energy Foundation was launched in 1991 by The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.  

Both papers focus on the challenge of developing U.S. transmission infrastructure and capacity, particularly in the West.  In The Way Forward:  Why Transmission Right Sizing and Federal Bridge Financing Hold the Key to Western Renewable Resource Development, the authors (Marcus Wood, Pam Jacklin, and myself) consider economy-of-scale and environmental impact concepts and their application to the sizing of transmission facilities.  The authors also argue for a significant overhaul of current financing and cost recovery mechanisms in order to provide a pathway for greater development of renewable energy resources.  You can download a copy of The Way Forward by clicking here.

In Uncork That Transmission Bottleneck:  A Legislative and Technological Roadmap for Tapping the West's Vast Renewable Energy Resources, the authors examine broader issues affecting renewable energy development.  This white paper proposes a number of policy goals that could drive transmission development in the West and on a national level.  You can download a copy of Uncork That Transmission Bottleneck by clicking here.

 We hope that you enjoy these papers.

Puget Wind Integration Charge REJECTED.

With a swift 13-page order today, FERC rejected Puget Sound Energy’s proposed wind integration rate, stating that the rate was not shown to be “just and reasonable” under section 205 of the Federal Power Act.  “Changing system conditions, such as an increasing amount of wind generation described by Puget, present unique challenges that may require novel solutions.  However, such solutions must fit the problems they are intended to solve, and the Commission must ensure that ratepayers are protected from rate proposals—such as the one proposed by Puget here—that are not shown to be related to the actual, demonstrable costs incurred in providing service.” 

 

To determine the rate, Puget had used a proxy rate calculated using hypothetical capacity costs from a hypothetical generator.  Puget chose its proxy from a group of five commercially available peaking units in the area.  FERC stated that although it will allow for the recovery of legitimate and verifiable opportunity costs,  Puget’s proposed rate was not a “reasonably accurate representation of the opportunity costs Puget incurs” in providing wind integration service.  Because FERC cannot permit Puget to over-recover its costs in providing the service, the rate was rejected.  Puget will undoubtedly be back to FERC with a rate that attempts to be consistent with FERC’s order.

 

Click here to read the order.

 

FERC Comments on Electric Storage Technologies Due August 9

Just a friendly reminder that the deadline to submit comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) on electric storage technologies is just around the corner. In its Request for Comments Regarding Rates, Accounting and Financial Reporting for New Electric Storage Technologies, FERC’s Office of Energy Policy and Innovation seeks comments on the following issues: 

  1. The use of and rate treatment for storage facilities, including when it is appropriate to classify a storage facility as a transmission asset.
  1. The mechanisms by which a storage project that is used for multiple purposes may be compensated. Specifically, FERC seeks comment on whether a storage project may be compensated as transmission (e.g. for supporting unbundled transmission service by supplying reactive power) and also be compensated for providing ancillary services or for enhancing the value of merchant generation (e.g. by shifting output from an off-peak period to an on-peak period).
  1. The possibility of creating a stand-alone contract storage service and whether the storage provider would provide the service of electricity storage, enabling its customers to determine how to use their contracted share of the storage.
  1. Whether new accounting and reporting requirements should be created in order to facilitate cost of service or other rate policies for new storage technologies, such as chemical batteries and flywheels.

In addition to the issues outlined above and other specific questions posed by FERC in its Request for Comments, FERC invites comments on other related aspects of the storage issues not specifically addressed by FERC in the above-referenced document.  Comments are due on Monday, August 9, 2010 and should reference Docket No. AD10-13-000.     

California and FERC Agreement to Coordinate Hydrokinetic Project Development

From our colleague Michael O'Connell:

On May 18, 2010, California and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to coordinate federal and state procedures and schedules for development of hydrokinetic projects off California’s coast. FERC previously entered MOUs for such coordination with Oregon, Washington and Maine.

The California-FERC MOU provides that the parties will encourage developers to seek pilot project licenses prior to a full commercial license. The footprint and number of devices deployed in California waters for testing would be limited under pilot project licenses in order to minimize environmental risk. FERC’s 2008 hydrokinetic pilot project white paper provides that pilot licenses would be issued for five years in order to allow licensees to conduct device testing and monitoring in support of studies required by applications for longer-term licenses. The California-FERC MOU also provides for consultation with stakeholders on the design of studies and other environmental matters.

According to the MOU, permits, leases and licenses issued by California agencies will require technology performance reporting and study results together with safeguards to ensure that projects will not have significant adverse effects on environmental, economic or cultural resources. The MOU parties also agree to share information from project developers regarding their facility’s energy production and “if applicable, power purchase contracts awards, during a project’s licensing application process and/or license term; provided that dissemination of the information is not otherwise protected from disclosure.” These MOU provisions are likely to raise confidentiality concerns among developers. The MOU recognizes that FERC cannot issue a license for a hydrokinetic project within California marine waters unless certain concurrences are issued or waived that a project is consistent with California’s Coastal Management Program. Any license issued by FERC will include, to the maximum extent practicable, terms and conditions determined by California agencies to be necessary to avoid, minimize and mitigate damage to fish, wildlife, and public trust resources.

The California-FERC MOU confirms state support for development of wave energy projects that can play a significant role in meeting the California’s goal of producing 33 percent of its electricity from renewable energy by 2020.

U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Third-Parties Challenging Energy Contract Rates Must Clear the Mobile-Sierra Hurdle

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important ruling clarifying how the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) must apply the Mobile-Sierra doctrine.  The Mobile-Sierra doctrine informs how FERC should evaluate whether a contract rate for energy is just and reasonable, and the doctrine provides that FERC's sole concern should be whether the contract rates being challenged adversely affect the public interest--a high hurdle.  Until today, some people questioned whether the Mobile-Sierra doctrine was limited to parties to a contract, and whether non-contracting parties bringing a challenge would be held to a lower standard.  The Court, however, made clear that the Mobile-Sierra doctrine should apply to any party (including FERC) challenging whether energy rates are just and reasonable, stating that a presumption that applies to contracting parties only, but not anybody else, fails to establish the contractual stability that Mobile-Sierra aimed to secure.

To read more about today's U.S. Supreme Court decision, click here.

FERC Conditionally Approves MISO Tariff Amendment on Cost Allocation

This afternoon, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission conditionally approved the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator's (MISO) proposed tariff amendment regarding allocating the cost of network upgrades for generation interconnection projects meeting MISO's regional expansion criteria and benefits (RECB) standards.  See my previous blog entry for a more detailed discussion on the history of the tariff amendment, as well as protests to the amendment filed by AWEA and others.

Under the decision rendered today, FERC found that the proposed solution provides an interim solution, and directs MISO to make a compliance filing (1) to fulfill its commitment to file superseding tariff revisions regarding the Phase II cost allocation methodology on or before July 15, 2010, and (2) to reflect certain conforming changes to its tariff.  In addition, FERC expects MISO to provide the Commission with status reports on the Phase II process.

To see any of the documents filed in this proceeding, go to FERC's eLibrary website and enter in Docket No. ER09-1431.

Smart Grid Favored in FERC Strategic Plan

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) highlighted smart grid technologies in its strategic plan for fiscal years 2009-2014 (the “Strategic Plan”). FERC found that our nation could potentially reduce peak electricity demand by up to 20% through the deployment of new technologies, including smart grid and demand response technologies.
 

In the Strategic Plan, FERC is establishing the use of smart grid technologies in 50% of all new transmission projects by 2014. This goal will be met through the (i) increased the development of smart grid standards and protocols (through a process coordinated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology) and (ii) the implementation of rate treatment policies favorable to smart grid technologies in the interim period between development and approval of smart grid standards. FERC has set the following Annual Performance Targets:

·         FY2010: Assessment of transmission planning process best practices, including the potential for collaborative decision making, and issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking as appropriate

·         FY 2011: As appropriate, issue Final Rule on transmission planning process best practices

·         FY 2012: Implement Final Rule as appropriate

·         FY 2013: Monitor implementation and performance

·         FY 2014: Evaluate performance and seek changes as necessary

FERC Aims to Accelerate Smart Grid Deployment

On July 16, 2009, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a Policy Statement on smart grid technologies, providing guidance on future smart grid interoperability standards and establishing an interim incentive rate policy that applies to near-term smart grid deployments (even those used in pilot or demonstration projects).  Notably, FERC identified four technologies as being key to smart grid development:  (1) digital devices and software that provide system operators with the near real-time ability to react to bulk power system conditions; (2) demand response; (3) electric storage devices, such as batteries and pumped storage, that will help integrate new resources into the grid; and (4) electric vehicles.  FERC intends that these technologies will inform both the smart grid standards development process as well as the Department of Energy's release of stimulus funds available under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.   

In addition, FERC established an interim rate policy that, once certain showings are made, will provide public utilities with the ability to recover the costs of FERC-jurisdictional smart grid technologies and the legacy systems being replaced.  The interim rate policy also allows public utilities to apply accelerated depreciation to smart grid deployments and recover the full cost of smart grid technologies that are later abandoned or made obsolete.  Public utilities seeking incentive rate treatment must file an appropriate application with FERC before it adopts smart grid interoperability standards.

For more information on FERC's Policy Statement, click here for our recently-released client alert.

If you would like to read the Policy Statement itself, click here.

FERC and Washington Sign MOU on Hydrokinetic Projects

Late last week, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) and the State of Washington signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) to coordinate their review of hydrokinetic energy projects in Washington state waters.  The MOU is intended to  reduce some of the regulatory barriers associated with siting and permitting such projects, while also ensuring that projects are undertaken in an environmentally and culturally sensitive manner. 

As described in the MOU, FERC and Washington have pledged to collaborate in the following ways:  (1) notifying each other of potential applicants for a preliminary permit, pilot project license, or license; (2) agreeing upon a schedule for processing license applications that will include milestones and encourage collaboration among various stakeholders; (3) coordinating the environmental reviews of projects proposed in Washington state waters and consulting with stakeholders on the design of applicable studies; and (4) agreeing that if Washington prepares a comprehensive plan with respect to the siting of hydrokinetic projects, in determining whether to approve a project license, FERC will consider whether the project is consistent with the state plan.  Notably, the MOU recognizes that Washington may submit an amendment to its coastal zone management plan to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) for approval, and that such a plan may identify a limited number of areas within Washington state waters where hydrokinetic projects may be initially located.  Whether NOAA would approve such a plan is unclear. 

Green Power Express Receives Green Light from FERC

On April 10, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved a request for various transmission infrastructure investment incentives submitted by Green Power Express LP (GPE), a transmission-only partnership that proposes to build a 765 kV "green superhighway" consisting of three interconnected loops in North and South Dakota, Minnesota, and Iowa.  GPE's proposal will also extend radially into Wisconsin, Illinois, and Indiana, making use of existing substations in some locations and constructing high voltage substations in others.  In total, the project will include approximately 3,000 miles of transmission lines that reach 12,000 MW of wind and stored energy.  GPE estimates the project's cost at $10-12 billion and hopes the project will be in service in 2020.

FERC's approved the following (non-exhaustive) key incentives that reduce GPE's exposure to risk in moving the project forward.

Abandoned Plant.  FERC granted GPE's request to recover prudently incurred expenses if the project is abandoned for reasons outside of GPE's control.  FERC stated that the recovery of abadonment costs is a means for encouraging transmission development, reducing the risk that GPE's investors may lose their entire investment. 

Regulatory Asset.  FERC will allow GPE to create initial and subsequent vintage regulatory assets in order to defer pre-construction, development, and start-up costs until GPE has customers from which it may later recover those costs.  Such cost deferral will also help GPE attract financiers.

Construction Work in Progress.  FERC approved GPE's request to include 100 percent of construction work in progress in its revenue requirement, allowing GPE to service its debt and reduce borrowing over the project's development--something that would otherwise be difficult for a $10-12 billion project with a 2020 in-service date.

The incentives granted to GPE, as well as other recent changes to FERC's transmission policies, show that the agency is becoming increasingly serious about spurring transmission development forward.  If we are to reach the 62 GW of wind currently in the Midwest ISO interconnection queue, as well as other renewable resources elsewhere, transmission developers will need creative regulatory solutions to help attract financiers and gain firm commitments from generation developers.  FERC continues to take positive steps forward.

Interior and FERC reach agreement on Outer Continental Shelf hydrokinetic projects; Secretary Salazar announces regional meeting details

From our colleague Cherise Oram:

Secretary of Interior (DOI) Ken Salazar and Acting Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Jon Wellinghoff have announced an agreement describing how the two agencies will work together to facilitate permitting renewable energy – particularly ocean wave and current projects – on the outer continental shelf (OCS). The announcement indicates that DOI’s Minerals Management Service (MMS) will retain leasing authority for ocean wave and current projects on the OCS, but that FERC will have the “primary responsibility to manage the licensing of such projects” pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) hydropower licensing provisions. FERC has long asserted that the FPA gives it concurrent jurisdiction with MMS’s leasing authority. The announcement indicates that the agencies will sign a more detailed Memorandum of Understanding describing how the agencies will coordinating their licensing and leasing processes for offshore projects.

This announcement comes just as Secretary Salazar, FERC Commissioner Philip Moeller and others were to testify before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on offshore renewable energy, including the jurisdictional debate between MMS and FERC.

Finally, Secretary Salazar has announced more detailed information on the four regional offshore renewable energy meetings he plans to hold April 6-16 in Atlantic City, New Orleans, Anchorage and San Francisco. For detailed information, see Secretary Salazar’s Invitation to Regional Meetings on Offshore Energy Development.
 

FERC Technical Conference on Wind Integration

From our colleague Jason Johns:

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will host a technical conference on March 2 to discuss the challenges of integrating large amounts of variable generation into wholesale markets and the grid. The Commission is also asking for innovative proposals that will help accomplish such large integration. Notably, the conference could hardly occur at a more appropriate time, as wind installation grew by 8,358 MW in the US in 2008 (more than gas-fired capacity) and certain regions of the country are hotly debating the costs of putting wind on the grid. Conference panelists will include Don Furman (Iberdrola Renewables), Brian Parsons and Brendan Kirby (National Renewable Energy Laboratory), Bob Kahn (Northwest & Intermountain Power Producers Coalition) and Steve Oliver (Bonneville Power Administration, which put its first wind integration charge in place in 2008).

The technical conference is available by free webcast.

FERC Rejects MISO's Market Coordination Service Proposal, Approves Anchor Tenant Merchant Transmission

From our colleague and FERC guru, Jason Johns:

MISO’s Proposed Market Coordination Service:

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today rejected the Midwest ISO’s proposed Market Coordination Service that would have given certain transmission owners access to the ISO energy and operating reserve markets without requiring those owners to hand over control of facilities or share in transmission development costs.  Although the proposal was an innovative approach to expanding the ISO’s market footprint, FERC worried that the proposal would harm consumers and cause the ISO to unravel as transmission owners opt out of full membership to avoid transmission cost-sharing.  FERC also questioned whether the proposal would attract more wind energy into the ISO market because, by leaving pancaked transmission rates intact, wind resources could face higher transmission rates as ISO members withdraw in favor of Market Service.  The Midwest ISO must remove all Market Service language from its tariff within the next 30 days.

Renewable Energy Transmission Project Rates:

In other news, FERC accepted a request for waiver of criteria traditionally used to evaluate merchant transmission projects.  In their applications, the Zephyr and Chinook merchant transmission projects proposed to presubscribe 50% of the projects’ 3,000 MW capacity to an “anchor tenant” wind developer in order to defray upfront development costs, and then allocate the remaining 50% through a traditional open season process.  The proposal was intended to avoid the “chicken-and-egg” scenario often associated with merchant transmission, i.e.,resources will not develop without assurances that transmission is available, and likewise transmission projects will not move forward without assurances from resource developers.  FERC’s acceptance of this modified approach to merchant transmission expressly opened the door to similar proposals in the future.  “Anchor tenant” merchant transmission is the new standard.

Client Alert: FERC's Conditional Approval of MISO Queue Reform

Check out our client alert on FERC's recent conditional approval of MISO's revised large generator interconnection process.  It provides highlights of the ruling and identifies next steps that MISO must take in order to flesh out some issues, including certain milestones that generators must meet in order to move towards getting their project interconnected.

Beth Soholt, executive director of Wind on the Wires, believes that the ruling is pretty consistent with what those in the industry expected, and that the intent was to give generators a more clear picture up front of what the actual costs are for carrying a project through to interconnection.  She thinks that we'll have to wait and see how MISO interprets the clarification requirements, and how generators respond to the new process, to really understand what the impact will be and whether this will result in a material change in the number of projects entering the queue.

Stay tuned!

FERC Rules on MISO Queue Reform Proposal

On August 25, FERC issued its ruling on the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator (MISO) plan to reform the generator interconnection queue process - the method by which transmission requirements for generators wishing to connect new projects to the grid in the Midwest are reviewed and approved.  FERC conditionally accepted the proposed tariff revisions, with an effective date of August 25, 2008, and directed MISO to make a compliance filing within 30 days of the Order.  Major changes include addition of a Pre-Queue Phase, addition of a Fast Track Process, revisions to the amount and timing of deposits, revisions to the milestones projects must meet to move forward, and limitations on the ability to suspend.

Watch for a client alert shortly!