On February 19, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order in Branch Street Solar Partners, LLC, addressing a rehearing and clarification request filed by several solar qualifying facilities (QFs) whose owners had failed to timely recertify their facilities after changes in ownership. In relevant part, the QF owners argued that their delays in filing recertifications did not change the fact that their projects remained QFs during the delay periods and that the projects in that time continued to be exempt from certain parts of the Federal Power Act (FPA)—namely, FPA section 205, which requires FERC authorization to engage in wholesale sales of energy, unless a project is exempt as a QF. 

FERC, however, determined that because the recertifications (via Form 556) for these projects did not occur until months or years after the ownership changes, the facilities’ prior QF certifications “may no longer be relied upon” and therefore FERC no longer considered the companies to be QFs during the interim period.  In other words, FERC seems to have determined that the projects ceased being QFs immediately upon the change in material facts—for these cases, changes in upstream ownership—and that the companies did not regain that status, and the associated regulatory exemptions, until the owners filed the recertifications.

FERC asserted that the failures to timely recertify did not revoke the facilities’ QF status (because that would require a formal process), but held that, because the companies’ certifications were out of date, the fact that companies may “no longer rely upon” their QF status meant they were no longer QFs at all—a change in regulatory status that seemingly occurred simultaneously with the change in facts and by operation of law.  As a result, FERC treated the facilities as if they were no longer QFs during the interim delay period and accordingly found that the companies had made wholesale sales without FPA section 205 authorization, triggering refunds for violating federal law.

So, what is the takeaway from FERC’s Branch Street order? Is every fact reported in Form 556 material, and must companies now report any change immediately, no matter how small? Not necessarily. However, FERC has voiced its belief that the “may no longer be relied upon” language that appears in its regulations may, in some circumstances, cause a company’s QF status to toggle on/off as quickly as the facts reported in Form 556 change due to external circumstances. Consequently, going forward, QFs should be mindful to update their QF self-certifications as soon as possible following upstream changes in control and potentially other changes.  

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jessica Bayles Jessica Bayles

Jessica Bayles is a partner in Stoel Rives’ Energy Development group, where she focuses her practice on energy regulatory support for renewable project development and transactions, compliance counseling, and regulatory controversies. Jessica counsels renewable energy developers and asset managers on compliance with the…

Jessica Bayles is a partner in Stoel Rives’ Energy Development group, where she focuses her practice on energy regulatory support for renewable project development and transactions, compliance counseling, and regulatory controversies. Jessica counsels renewable energy developers and asset managers on compliance with the requirements of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). She has significant experience in complex litigation and settlement proceedings before FERC. She also advises large electric customers in state public utility commission proceedings.

Click here for Jessica Bayles’ full bio.

Photo of Jason Johns Jason Johns

Jason Johns advises independent power producers, utilities, investors, and large users of gas and power resources with matters arising in power markets and state and federal energy regulatory arenas. Jason appears regularly in proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and in negotiations…

Jason Johns advises independent power producers, utilities, investors, and large users of gas and power resources with matters arising in power markets and state and federal energy regulatory arenas. Jason appears regularly in proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and in negotiations at the ISO/RTO level, where he represents independent power developers and utilities. His experience includes negotiating major facility contracts, such as interconnection, transmission, and power purchase agreements; prosecuting disputes at FERC; and counseling and defending clients on issues related to regulatory compliance.

Jason also works closely with large commercial and industrial users of electricity and gas, such as aerospace companies, pulp and paper mills, steel mills, and tech company data centers. In that role, Jason helps clients negotiate power and gas supply contracts, interstate pipeline capacity asset management agreements, and pipeline bypass agreements. Jason has also assisted these clients with demand management agreements, the installation of on-site resources (such as battery storage, fuel cells, and solar PV), and with retail and wholesale power purchase agreements for renewable energy and other resources. Jason also serves as a board member of The Climate Trust, a national leader in carbon offset projects and innovative climate change solutions.

Jason and his wife are parents to two growing boys, and they live just outside of Portland, Oregon.

Click here for Jason John’s full bio.

Sam Wong

Sam Wong advises clients on the development, financing, and regulation of energy projects across the United States. With experience counseling utilities, independent power producers, and investors, he guides clients through complex regulatory frameworks, litigation, and transactional matters at the intersection of federal and…

Sam Wong advises clients on the development, financing, and regulation of energy projects across the United States. With experience counseling utilities, independent power producers, and investors, he guides clients through complex regulatory frameworks, litigation, and transactional matters at the intersection of federal and state energy laws, environmental compliance, and emerging carbon markets. Click here to read Sam’s full bio.