The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC or Commission) has launched a new rulemaking to update Electric Tariff Rule 21 (Rule 21). This proceeding was initiated through an Order Instituting Rulemaking (OIR) adopted at the August 14, 2025 CPUC voting meeting, and seeks to modernize interconnection procedures in response to the rapid evolution of Distributed Energy Resource (DER) technologies, including battery storage and electric vehicles.

Rule 21 is the tariff that describes the interconnection, operating, and metering requirements for generation facilities seeking to connect to an investor-owned utility’s (IOUs)[1] distribution or transmission system, for interconnections over which the Commission has jurisdiction.  Rule 21 governs interconnections for: Net Energy Metering (NEM) facilities, non-export generating facilities, qualifying facilities intending to sell power at avoided cost to the host utility, customer-sited generation and storage (e.g., rooftop solar, battery systems), and DERs connecting to IOU distribution systems. Rule 21 does not apply to the interconnection of generating or storage facilities intending to participate in wholesale markets overseen by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). These facilities must typically apply for interconnection under either a FERC-jurisdictional Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff when connecting to the distribution system or the California Independent System Operator Tariff when connecting to the transmission system.

The OIR outlines eight preliminary topics for consideration:

  • Electrical Independence Tests (Screens Q & R): Potential interim or long-term reforms to electrical independence processes to streamline transmission upgrade assessments and reduce delays.[2]
  • Interconnection Processes: Improving IOU compliance with timeline benchmarks, refining dispute resolution (including the Expedited Interconnection Dispute Resolution process), and ensuring the IOUs’ proper use of Integration Capacity Analysis.
  • Interconnection Pathways and Standards: Addressing technical requirements for non-exporting storage, vehicle-to-grid systems, and aligning Rule 21 with industry interconnection and equipment standards and smart inverter settings.
  • Cost Sharing for Grid Upgrades: Developing frameworks for allocating upgrade costs among multiple interconnection applicants, including potential impact of upgrade cost sharing on FERC-jurisdictional Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) projects interconnecting on the same or related distribution circuits, and addressing cost responsibility due to sustained load reductions.
  • Tariff Implementation Costs: Reviewing Rule 21’s fees, cost allocation rules, and other requirements that may impact or reduce costs related to implementing the interconnection tariff.
  • NEM and Net Billing Tariff (NBT) Alignment: Potential reforms to harmonize definitions of “system size” and interconnection rules for non-export additions to existing NEM systems in response to recent NBT updates.
  • DER Communications and Interoperability: Evaluating costs and standards for communications and interoperability of inverter-based resources, including distributed energy resources management systems and bidirectional communications.
  • Coordination with WDAT: Ensuring consistency between Rule 21 and WDAT procedures.

The full OIR is available here.  Stakeholders may file opening comments within 60 days of the issuance of the order, and reply comments are due 20 days after the date to file opening comments.

[1] The IOUs under Commission jurisdiction include the Large IOUs—Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas & Electric.  Rule 21 equivalent tariff rules apply to the three small and multi-jurisdictional utilities under Commission jurisdiction—Bear Valley Electric Service, Liberty Utilities, and PacifiCorp, d.b.a Pacific Power.

[2] Screen Q evaluates whether an interconnection request requires upgrades to the transmission system. Screen R evaluates whether an interconnection request is electrically independent of other interconnection requests earlier in the queue. If upgrades are found to be necessary under either screen, the interconnection request may be studied under the California Independent System Operator’s Transmission Cluster Study Process. (Rule 21, Sections G.3.a and G.3.b.).

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Meghan O’Brien Meghan O’Brien
Meghan O’Brien offers a solid energy regulation and policy background. Her practice includes representing clients before the California Public Utilities Commission and in stakeholder proceedings at the California Independent System Operator to advocate for favorable state energy policies and ensure compliance. Meghan advises
Meghan O’Brien offers a solid energy regulation and policy background. Her practice includes representing clients before the California Public Utilities Commission and in stakeholder proceedings at the California Independent System Operator to advocate for favorable state energy policies and ensure compliance. Meghan advises independent power producers, utilities, investors, and large users of gas and power resources on matters arising in power markets under the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). She also assists project developers with regulatory due diligence associated with mergers and acquisitions, as well as energy project financings.

Click here to view Meghan O’Brien’s full bio.

Photo of Seth Hilton Seth Hilton

Seth Hilton, a partner in Stoel Rives’ Energy Development group, focuses his practice on energy regulation and litigation, representing clients before a variety of energy regulatory agencies in California, including the California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission, as well as…

Seth Hilton, a partner in Stoel Rives’ Energy Development group, focuses his practice on energy regulation and litigation, representing clients before a variety of energy regulatory agencies in California, including the California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission, as well as in stakeholder proceedings at the California Independent System Operator. His clients include developers of thermal and renewable generation, energy storage developers, transmission developers, energy service providers, and investor-owned and publicly-owned utilities. Seth also represents energy clients in state and federal court and has significant experience in a wide variety of complex commercial litigation.

Click here for Seth Hilton’s full bio.